Update: Please see my published novella on this subject. It contains 14 references to medical studies and is designed to help laypeople understand the science behind this complex medical topic.
Bruce Jenner’s transition to Caitlyn Jenner has raised the topic of transgenderism into the forefront of public debate. But, like the climate change debate, both sides unfortunately cling to incorrect principles instead of focusing on the science. Being “transgender” is a medical condition, not a social movement, as the Right and Left would incorrectly have you think. My citations for this assertion are at the end of the article.
In order to examine this issue carefully, one must first understand the idea of where gender comes from. Science tells us that most people identify what gender they are when they are about 2-3 years old. Gender constancy, or the idea that your gender will not change, doesn’t develop until people are about 7-8 years old. [1, 2] That means that little children might “try out” being a boy when they are actually a girl, but this is a phase, and it will pass relatively quickly. However, gender determination is not very easy for everyone. Some people are born with ambiguous genitalia, a condition commonly referred to as “intersex.” At birth, both genitals might be present, the genitals might be missing, or the genitals might be formed incorrectly. Sometimes, genitals are formed correctly but the right hormones are missing, or there are mixed hormones. Sometimes, the chromosomes are mixed, like those with XXY. The standard care in the past was that the doctor would guess whichever procedure would be easiest to perform, based on what he saw, and then the parents would raise the child in that gender…but this did not always work out. There were children who would grow up knowing that they are definitely the other gender. Additionally, there is at least one case of an individual whose circumcision went wrong and he was raised as a girl afterward…and it ended tragically. Those raised in the incorrect gender know from a very early age that things are not right. They, like most humans, identify what gender they are when they are about 2-3, but unlike most humans, they are told by everyone around them that they are wrong. Imagine living that life. Imagine being told that you are wrong about something so personal, so key to your personality and your spirit, that you begin to doubt your own sanity.
It follows logically from the experiences of these intersex individuals that gender is not developed from the genitals, but instead, it comes from the brain. This is firmly rooted in science. Multiple studies [3-10] have shown us that male and female brains operate differently. They form different white matter patterns, visible on an MRI. They respond differently to spatial and verbal tasks. They have different connections, different structure, and are built for different ways of thinking. It should be obvious, then, that gender is rooted not in the tissue below the belt, but instead in the tissue above the neck. And this means everything
to transgender individuals.
Scientific studies have shown that transgender individuals have the structure of the opposite chromosomal gender. [11- 13] In English, that means that people who have the “body” of a man but believe they are a woman actually have the brain of a woman. If this is the case, then why is it that transgender individuals are not treated as patients, as intersex individuals mostly have been in the past? Why is society so convinced that this is a “choice,” with the Left arguing that it is their right to make it, and the Right arguing that people cannot change their gender?
This science is new, and that is part of the problem. The social movement has been around a lot longer than the science. The idea that society has no right to tell a person what he can and cannot do with his own body, has been around a heck of a lot longer than an MRI of a transgender person’s brain. Also, the scientific truth hurts the liberal narrative of gender fluidity. The idea that people can change their gender, and have the right to do so, is a powerful “liberating” idea. It’s a lot easier to march in the street for “rights” under a rainbow colored flag than it is to read medical journal articles.
The media is another part of the problem. People think of “transgender” and images of a Jerry Springer circus come to mind. Some poorly-dressed drag queen on a TV show about a serial killer who targets prostitutes pops into one’s memory. People do not think of a patient in a hospital getting a brain scan. They think of a freak in an alley, or a stage.
And finally, churches are hugely behind on this issue. Many churches tell “transgender” people that they are sinning just for existing. They have no idea what science is out there, because they hide behind the phrase “God doesn’t make mistakes.” Imagine telling that to a child born with cancer. “You don’t have cancer. God wouldn’t make that mistake.” The logic simply isn’t there. And those churches that have gotten behind “transgender” people are usually doing it for the wrong reasons, as are most liberals. They believe that it is a person’s “right” to choose what gender they are. They say they are “accepting,” and call it “Christlike” when they make that blind jump into the social movement abyss. They don’t examine the hard question of whether the spirit is male or female–something that only God and the individual can determine.
What can happen to transgender people as a result of this mess? From the age of 2-3, the person knows they are in the “wrong body” (which, spiritually speaking, is not true, but we’ll get there in a bit). They tell their parents that they are, say, a boy, but are contradicted and told that they are a girl. Everyone tells them this, from the time they are very young throughout their childhood. They firmly believe they will go through puberty the “boy way”, but then it happens and it turns out that it was not as they expected. With still a strong male identity, but with no support, they become suicidal (at an extremely alarming, nearly 50% rate). Many will attempt suicide and (thankfully) fail. They enter a clinic, and tension between they and their parents grows. By the time they’re ready to leave the house, they can’t wait to get out–maybe they run away. They run right into the arms of whoever will accept them. Not their church. Not their parents. It will be some liberal group, which will tell them that they have a right to live however they want. They will adopt those beliefs, and they will become, for lack of better words, radicalized, believing that they have been put down by a “system of oppression” and “privilege.” They will march under a colored flag and demand “rights” for those who have been “marginalized.” They may get hormones from a clinic funded by taxpayer dollars. By now, they are probably militant atheists who hate anything to do with religion. It is unlikely that they will have what their conservative parents hoped would be a “normal” life.
How do we prevent this mess of a social movement from growing into the accepted norm? We, as a society, must approach this from a scientific perspective. So few people are affected by this illness that it is unlikely a giant breakthrough is going to happen any time soon, in the diagnostic imaging department. But it would be nice if, in 20 years, we can diagnose a 10-year-old before he hits puberty, provide puberty blockers, and then hormones, to ensure he goes through puberty the right way, and can lead a normal life. In the mean time, we can still provide treatment to people without picture perfect diagnostic testing. Most individuals with this disease will show persistent, consistent identities with the opposite chromosomal gender, and it will last throughout childhood and into adolescence. If a doctor sees this presentation, it makes sense to provide puberty blockers to a child who is not yet in puberty. This has been proven to be reversible, and not harmful to the child. It simply delays puberty. Then, when the family and the child are absolutely certain of the diagnosis, it makes a lot of sense to provide the correct hormones. If parents have a child like this, they can offer the same support and love to him as they would if he had a different disease–say, misformed genitalia, or a tumor on his leg, or diabetes. With strong parental and medical support, the child is a lot more likely to grow up believing that medicine, not marches in the streets, will be beneficial to him.
And that brings us to the most critical aspect of this story: the spiritual society must also approach this from a scientific perspective. How is a church to embrace science? The same way they do treatments for cancer. They do not excommunicate members who receive radiation, do they? Why then would they banish or isolate members who seek treatment for any other disease? If a loving church wraps its arms around a transgender teen who is receiving hormones so he can go through puberty the right way, under the supervision of a doctor…what difference would that make in that teen’s life? I can guarantee you, a lot less would be atheists. A lot less would come away feeling rejected by society. And all of his peers who look on at this treatment would be less likely to turn away from churches because they see them as hypocrites. Whether a person’s spirit is male or female can only be determined by God, and that individual. Churches should encourage troubled people to pray to receive personal revelation as to whether their spirit is male or female, and then support them in whatever medical intervention they and their doctors deem is appropriate. Transgender people would learn that they were not put into the “wrong body”, any more than a person with cancer was put into the “wrong body.” Rather, they have a medical challenge to overcome, and a church community and family that is 100% behind them in their efforts to overcome it. If we, as conservatives, want to be on the right side of history, we must end this ‘social movement’ nonsense and start treating this issue with the lens of science and love that it deserves.
 Slaby, R.G., & Frey, K. S. Development of gender constancy and selective attention to same-sex models. Child Development, 1975, 46, 849–856
 Marcus, D., & Overton, W. F. The development of cognitive gender constancy and sex role preferences. Child Development, 1978, 49, 434–444
 Speck, Oliver, Ernst, Thomas, Braun, Jochen, Koch, Christoph, Miller, Eric, Chang, Linda. (2000) “Gender differences in the functional organization of the brain for working memory.” NeuroReport Volume 11 Number 113: 2581-2585
 Allen, John S., Damasio, Hanna, Grabowski, Thomas J., Bruss, Joel, Zhang, Wei. (2003) “Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray-white composition of the human cerebrum.” NeuroImage Volume 18 Issue 4: 880-894.
 Keller, Katherine, Menon, Vinod. (2009) “Gender differences in the functional and structural neuroanatomy of mathematical cognition.” NeuroImage Volume 47 Issue 1: 342-352.
 Döhler KD. (1991) “The pre- and postnatal influence of hormones and neurotransmitters on sexual differentiation of the mammalian hypothalamus.” Int Rev Cytol 131:1–57
 Cooke BM, Hegstrom CD, Villeneuve LS, Breedlove SM. (1998) “Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate brain: principles and mechanisms.” Front Neuroendocrinol 19:323–362.
 Del Abril A, Segovia S, Guillamon A. (1987) “The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the rat: regional sex differences controlled by gonadal steroids early after birth.” Dev Brain Res 32:295–300.
 Guillamon A, Segovia S, Del Abril A. (1988) “Early effects of gonadal steroids on the neuron number in the medial posterior region and the lateral division of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the rat.” Dev Brain Res 44:281–290.
 Chung WCJ, Swaab DF, De Vries GJ. (2000) “Apoptosis during sexual differentiation of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the rat brain.” J Neurobiol 43:234–243.
 Zhou, J.N., Hofman, M.A., Gooren, L.J., Swaab, D.F. (1995) “A Sex Difference in the Human Brain and its Relation to Transsexuality.” NATURE, 378:68-70. http://faculty.bennington.edu/~sherman/sex/TRANSGENDER.pdf
 Rametti, Giuseppina, Carillo, Beatriz, Gómez-Gil, Esther, Junque, Carme, Segovia, Santiago, Gomez, Angel, Guillamon, Antonio. (2011) “White matter microstructure in female to male transsexuals before cross-sex hormonal treatment. A diffusion tensor imaging study.” Journal of Psychiatric Research Volume 45 Issue 2: 199-204.
 Kruijver, Frank P.M., Zhou, J.N., Pool, Chris W., Hofman, Michel A., Gooren, Louis J.G., Swaab, Dick F. (2000) ” Male-to-Female Transsexuals Have Female Neuron Numbers in a Limbic Nucleus.” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Volume 85 Number 5: 2034-2041.